From Season Deep
Linn Appointed in October, Tulsi Gabard (who will leave Congress in a few weeks) and Paul Gossar (he had six brothers and sisters) were speaking to their electorate. It doesn’t have to be in Congress), Collaborate to promote incredibly Stupid Anti-Class 230 MathIt takes 230 account protections from any site that provides basic data tracking or algorithmic feeds.
Obviously this was not enough, because they are now paired Second Introduction to Anti-230 Math That (believe me?) Is even more ridiculous. They call it the Break Up Big Tech Act.
The 2020 Discrimination Big Tech Act protects lawsuits from interactive computer service providers involved in certain fraudulent activities, including social media companies that publish and censor content. In particular, the 2020 Discrimination Big Tech Act eliminates legal liberties for suppliers involved in the following activities.
- Selling and displaying personalized as well as contextual ads without user permission
- From the sale of an interactive computer service directly, that is, the consumer to the commodity commodity commodity commodity commodity commodity commodity commodity commodity commodity commodity commodity commodity commodity commodity commodity commodity commodity commodity commodity commute
- Working as a marketplace in a digital space, facilitating the integration of goods into a commercial stream
- Implement digital products and designs designed to engage users and make them addicted to the service
- Work as a publisher using algorithms to mediate or censor content without user choice
There are definitely many correct questions about that list of activities, and whether they are allowed or not, and how they should be monitored. All of these need to be debated and discussed to some degree. But for any company that does that, “Destroy only 230 accountability protections” … is legally insane.
This bill is not going anywhere, because this Congress is basically over, so I will not go into how stupid this draft bill is, but the last point is that it is punishing a company by choosing editorial elections and the first amendment may be unconstitutional for the taxpayer and the buffalo. He may want to explain.
Gabard still seems to be really smarter than her reality Dude sued on Google it was He was simply dismissed. But here’s the key: it was a lawsuit Dismissed for reasons of 1st Amendment, Not because of 230. And changing 230 does not change the 1st amendment (but it does not seem to care what she took to protect and protect).
Thanks for reading this textbook post. We truly appreciate that you are giving us so much time in this world that you are competing for everything. We work hard every day to deliver quality content to our community.
Texan is one of the few truly independent media outlets left. We do not have a large corporation behind us, and in this day and age when advertisers are increasingly interested in sponsoring small independent sites – we rely heavily on our community to support us – especially those who, like us, are reluctant to draw attention to the report. And analysis.
While other websites use wall-to-wall, subscription requirements, and increasingly disruptive ads, we are always open to technology. But to continue this, We need your support. From direct donations to special subscriptions and good merchandise – and we offer a variety of ways to help our readers with every little help. thanks.
–Techder team
Filed 1st Amendment, Destroy large technology works, Paul Gossar, Section 230, Tulsi Gababar
0 Comments